Using a Comma before And in a List

Writers frequently wonder whether a comma should go before the conjunction and in a list of three or more items. Despite the fact that not all style books agree on this issue, we recommend using a comma after the next-to-last item in a series—the serial comma, as it is called. This recommendation also applies, of course, when the items in a list are joined by the conjunction or.

Although many of us were taught not to use a comma before and in a list, today the vast majority of style guides do advocate the use of the serial comma because it can prevent a possible misreading. Consider this sentence, for example:

Without the serial comma, the individual series items are difficult to identify. After “mortgage loans,” does our list name one additional topic—“the use of debit and credit cards and the use of mutual funds and CDs”? Or does it contain two more items—“the use of debit and credit cards” and “mutual funds and CDs”? Or does it contain three more items—“the use of debit and credit cards,” “mutual funds,” and “CDs”? With the serial comma added, we can see clearly that we have here a list of four program topics, not two or three:

Although such logical precision might seem trivial when we are talking about topics at a conference, it can be absolutely crucial in certain kinds of writing. Take legal documents, for example. The Texas Law Review Manual on Usage, Style, and Editing (9th ed., Texas Law Review Association, 2002) insists on the use of the serial comma. In The Lawyer's Book of Rules for Effective Legal Writing, Thomas R. Haggard says, “The serial comma is essential in legal writing because it promotes clarity” (17). Consider this sentence:

Without the serial comma, the sentence does not clearly indicate that each of the three children is to be given an equal share of the inheritance. Quite possibly (especially if Huey were a jerk), Huey would get half the money, and Dewey and Louie would have to split the other half.

Support this site! If you value the information on this Web site, please help us cover our expenses. Thanks!

Here's another example of a sentence in which the omission of the serial comma has a substantive effect on the meaning:

Without the serial comma before the last and, the sentence could be interpreted to mean that only the children of Betty and Harold Spivey are to receive a share of the inheritance and not the children of the other couples. But with the additional comma, the sentence more clearly communicates the idea that the children of all three couples are to receive a share:

In all kinds of writing, of course, the meaning of the items in a list may be obvious without the serial comma. But we are usually poor judges of our own clarity—or lack thereof. We tend to think we are being clear because we know what we mean to say. If we were to write, for example, “The table was covered with gifts, food and flowers,” the meaning might appear to be quite clear without the serial comma. But even this seemingly simple and clear sentence could be read two ways: The table may be covered with three different kinds of items: (1) gifts, (2) food, and (3) flowers. Or the table may be covered with gifts, all of which fall into one of two categories—food or flowers.

It is always wise to check your company's in-house style manual or the style manual that governs your profession. In the United States, the vast majority of reputable style guides—with the exception of style guides for journalists, such as the well-known manual published by the Associated Press—encourage or even mandate the serial comma. We don't know for certain, but we can suppose that print journalists omit the serial comma because in their profession, saving keystrokes means saving money. Nonetheless, even style guides that generally discourage its use do agree that at times it is necessary for clarity and/or readability.

TEST YOURSELF

Which of these sentences would be improved by the addition of the serial comma?

1. Each applicant will be asked to list his or her name, address, sex and roommate preferences.
2. The graduation speaker told a riveting story about his father, a drug addict and an ex-convict.
3. In the final round of the cooking competition, the contestants had to prepare three different quiches: broccoli, ham and cheese and spinach.
4. Sunday's reception will feature a variety of elegant finger sandwiches: cream cheese and pineapple, marinated bell peppers and goat cheese, asparagus and butter and sliced cucumber and mint mayonnaise.
5. “The woods are lovely, dark and deep.” (Robert Frost, in “Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening”)

ANSWERS

1. Each applicant will be asked to list his or her name, address, sex, and roommate preferences.
2. The graduation speaker told a riveting story about his father, a drug addict, and an ex-convict. [However, if the speaker's father were, indeed, a drug addict and ex-convict, the sentence would be correct without the serial comma.]
3. In the final round of the cooking competition, the contestants had to prepare three different quiches: broccoli, ham, and cheese and spinach. [Or “In the final round of the cooking contest, the contestants had to prepare three different quiches: broccoli, ham and cheese, and spinach.” The serial comma goes after “ham” if the cheese belongs in the spinach quiche but after “cheese” if the cheese belongs in the ham quiche.]
4. Sunday's reception will feature a variety of elegant finger sandwiches: cream cheese and pineapple, marinated bell peppers and goat cheese, asparagus and butter, and sliced cucumber and mint mayonnaise.
5. This sentence is actually correct without the serial comma: In his 1969 edition of Frost’s poetry (the edition that most people have on their bookshelves), Edward Connery Lathem took the liberty of adding the serial comma to this line despite the fact that Frost had never added it in any published version authorized during his lifetime. In Frost’s version (without the serial comma), “dark and deep” are an appositive for “lovely.” The speaker thinks that the woods are lovely precisely because they are dark and deep, giving us insight into the speaker’s state of mind. By adding the serial comma, Lathem changes the meaning of the sentence. Instead of a single adjective (“lovely”) with an appositive (“lovely” = “dark and deep”), Lathem's version suggests that the woods have three separate qualities: they are lovely, they are dark, and they are deep.(For a fuller discussion of the problems with the Lathem edition of Frost, see Donald Hall's "Robert Frost Corrupted" in Breakfast Served Any Time All Day [Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2004, pages 81 to 99]. An authoritative version of Robert Frost's poems was published in 1995 by the Library of America and is listed on our “books we recommend” page.)

Copyright 2009 Get It Write

Show your support for this site! We have kept our promise never to charge our subscribers (now more than 10,000 of you!) or the many others who benefit from these pages on the Web. We aren’t trying to get rich, but we do need to cover the costs of hosting this Web site and maintaining our newsletter service. If you value the information you find on this Web site, please use the PayPal link below to make a secure online contribution so that we can continue to offer this service: Back to Tip List GIW Home | Most Recent Tip | Subscribe | Books | Contact